CinemaSound from jwsound.net

dedicated to those who do sound for image

Mike Peter Reed

Neumann RSM 191 - bypassing the MTX and cabling direct to 702T

This should be possible, right? (Though may lose additional shielding?) My BP4029 (for example) is 5-pin through-and-through and I've never experienced interference.

Let me give you some context:

I picked up the RSM 191 as an eBay "bargain" (always a risk, but you don't see many 2nd hand in the UK)

The supplied cabling or MTX has an obvious earthing problem somewhere so there's a really bad hum (which goes away if you use your body as earth by touching the metal on the connector or the MTX box). The mic itself is fine.

Since I already have quite a bit of 5-pin XLR cabling and splitters around it makes sense to me to create a cable (perhaps just a tail) to take the 7-pin DIN down to 5-pin XLR. The 702T can handle the P48 and matrixing so the Neumann MTX box seems a little redundant anyway - the only reason I'd seem to need it is to patch into its 5-pin XLR output (and if doing single-system which I'm always looking for reasons not to do anyway).

Just looking for opinions on this approach, maybe someone's already done something similar?

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Transformerless circuitry... not always the best sellingpoint... :)

Reply to This

I'm somewhat embarrassed to say that I discovered I was trailing the cabling over a mains connected PSU which was causing the hum.

Question still stands though - is it possible (or even sensible) to bypass the MTX and wire a XLR-5 cable to the 702T and let that do the matrixing?

Reply to This

Mike:

As I recall, the output of the RSM-191 at the seven pin connector consists of unbalanced audio on two leads, a +48 volt power lead, a -48 volt power lead (needed for the side capsule powering if I remember correctly), a +10 volt power lead, and ground. There is a transformer and other circuitry contained in the matrix to control the steering. As such, I don't think you are going to be able to connect this directly to a +48 phantom powered mike circuit with a fair amount of additional circuitry.

Either way, I would look at the schematic very closely before attempting any other powering schema,e as there is a good chance that you could blow the damage the mike circuit.

You might want to try posting a question on the Neumann message forum. They are always extremely helpful.

Good luck.

Scott D. Smith C.A.S.

Reply to This

RSS

Badge

Loading…

SpeedTest

Test your Internet connection speed at Speedtest.net

© 2009   Created by Jeffrey S. Wexler on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!